Sponsored By: 
How Legal Guardrails, Clinical Judgment, and IT Governance Shape Safe AI Adoption
Behavioral health organizations are rapidly adopting AI to address documentation burden, compliance risk, and workforce strain — but most AI tools are designed to be generic, context-agnostic, and detached from organizational reality.
In this session, we introduce the concept of Organizational AI: an approach where AI is intentionally designed to behave in alignment with an organization’s legal obligations, clinical governance, state and county requirements, accreditation standards, and risk tolerance.
Led by a behavioral health technology CEO, the CIO of a large community behavioral health organization, and a nationally recognized behavioral health attorney, this session explores how AI is being implemented in practice — not theory.
Through a real-world case study, speakers will examine how:
- Legal guardrails (HIPAA, 42 CFR Part 2, consent, and data segmentation) shape AI system design
- Clinical judgment is preserved through clinician-in-the-loop oversight, ensuring AI supports — never replaces — care decisions
- IT and compliance leaders operationalize AI governance across state, county, payer, and accreditation requirements
Rather than focusing on tools or models, this session provides a decision framework for leaders evaluating AI as an organizational capability — one that must reflect mission, regulation, and clinical values.
Attendees will leave with:
- A new way to distinguish organizational AI from generic AI
- Practical insight into how legal and regulatory constraints inform AI design
- A governance blueprint for safe, scalable AI adoption in behavioral health